Call it loose coupling, application of encapsulation, avoiding god objects, plugin-based architecture, or whatever else, but I don't like having objects which carry out the functions of another class's objects. I believe that each class should contain the full measure of its functionality, so that adding it to a project is as simple as use MyClass; without requiring modification of any existing code for the new class to do its thing. (Existing code will often need to be modified to tell it to use the new class, of course, but that's not what I'm talking about here.)

Unfortunately, KiokuDB::Tutorial's example of using Search::GIN hardcodes knowledge of how the Person class should be indexed into the database ->connect call. I'm sure this was just done for the sake of showing the simplest possible example, but here's how I set things up so that my ->connects don't have to change when a new class or index is added.

My second trip to #kiokudb came about when I got to the point of wanting to edit my objects through a web interface, which called for identifying the object I was editing. While Kioku was assigning unique IDs to each object which would be perfect for the purpose, the objects themselves didn't have access to their IDs and so couldn't provide them to my templates for insertion in the pages. Starting from my root node and walking the object graph every time seemed unreasonable and

$dir->store($obj);
$obj->id($dir->object_to_id($conf));
$dir->store($obj);

As mentioned in my last post here, I've recently started in on a free-time project to teach myself some of the more-currently-popular modules that I haven't been using. So far, that means Moose and KiokuDB. Moose has been coming along pretty readily so far (I'm not entirely sure whether that's because of MooseX::Declare or in spite of it), but KiokuDB has had me scratching my head quite a bit and sent me off to IRC twice for help.